Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN
От | Jose Arthur Benetasso Villanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cfa33a8e-de58-d5f1-7020-d0f01571a49d@benetasso.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN (Andrey Borodin <amborodin86@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN
Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 27 Nov 2022, Andrey Borodin wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 1:29 PM Andrey Borodin <amborodin86@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I was wrong. GIN check does similar gin_refind_parent() to lock pages > in bottom-up manner and truly verify downlink-child_page invariant. Does this mean that we need the adjustment in docs? > Here's v17. The only difference is that I added progress reporting to > GiST verification. > I still did not implement heapallindexed for GIN. Existence of pending > lists makes this just too difficult for a weekend coding project :( > > Thank you! > > Best regards, Andrey Borodin. > I'm a bit lost here. I tried your patch again and indeed the heapallindexed inside gin_check_parent_keys_consistency has a TODO comment, but it's unclear to me if you are going to implement it or if the patch "needs review". Right now it's "Waiting on Author". -- Jose Arthur Benetasso Villanova
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: