Re: [HACKERS] "SQL sentence"?
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] "SQL sentence"? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cf3ce85d-4bd5-4b5f-059a-484c4038a2b8@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] "SQL sentence"? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] "SQL sentence"?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/17/17 10:19 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> (FWIW, I'm wondering because I was just looking to see why there's no >> details for things like altering a column in a table.) > Do you mean you want to have access to the details of the alter table > operations being executed? There's no structured data for that; you > need to write a C function to examine the pg_ddl_command opaque column. Yeah. It doesn't seem unreasonable for a user to want to get at that info. Could the opaque column be mapped to a composite? I guess that'd be a bit of a pain due to the union. :/ And I have a suspicion that alterTable.subcmds is a list of CollectedCommand, making things more fun. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: