Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cedfd465-d7ae-503e-a9aa-b02b457e1f3d@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/3/17 5:23 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote: > I got this remark about IsCatalogClass() from Andres offline as well, > but it's not true, it only checks for FirstNormalObjectId for objects in > pg_catalog and toast schemas, not anywhere else. I see your statement is correct, but I'm not sure the overall behavior is sensible. Either we consider the information_schema tables to be catalog tables, and then IsCatalogClass() should be changed, or we consider then non-catalog tables, and then we should let them be in publications. I don't think having a third category of sometimes-catalog tables is desirable. Currently, they clearly behave like non-catalog tables, since you can just drop and recreate them freely, so I would choose the second option.It might be worth changing that, but it doesn't haveto be the job of this patch set. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: