Re: wal segment size
| От | Laurenz Albe |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: wal segment size |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | cdea7a44c8c696d762118d40295fded2f6493010.camel@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: wal segment size (Andrew <adhenry.9@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: wal segment size
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2025-12-19 at 09:26 +0100, Andrew wrote: > As an oracle dba new to Postgres, I’m used to the concept of context switches and latch issues > with regards to transaction log switches. Does Postgres have a similar mechanism with latching > etc when it switches to a new wal segment that is alleviated when increasing the size of the > wal segments? Not really. PostgreSQL doesn't reuse WAL segments in a circular fashion like Oracle does. At the end of a checkpoint, it creates new, empty WAL segments for future use, so if there is a need to switch to a new segment, there is no need to wait for anything. Yours, Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: