Re: range_agg

On Fri, 2019-07-05 at 07:58 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> The question is naming - should be this agg function named
> "range_agg", and multi range agg "multirange_agg"? Personally, I have
> not a problem with range_agg, and I have not a problem so it is based
> on union operation. It is true so only result of union can be
> implemented as range simply. When I though about multi range result,
> then there are really large set of possible algorithms how to do some
> operations over two, three values.

Hi Pavel,

Can you explain in more detail? Would an intersection-based aggregate
be useful? If so, and we implement it in the future, what would we call
it?

Regards,
    Jeff Davis