Re: Adding argument names to aggregate functions
От | Jim Jones |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adding argument names to aggregate functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cd7c78aa-ec48-3e40-a7f9-edf77ff5742e@uni-muenster.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Adding argument names to aggregate functions (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Adding argument names to aggregate functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 18.04.23 12:27, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > Link to the actual job: > https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5881376021413888 > > The failure was: > > [09:54:38.727] 216/262 postgresql:recovery / recovery/031_recovery_conflict ERROR 198.73s exit status 60 > > Looking at its log: > > https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5881376021413888/testrun/build/testrun/recovery/031_recovery_conflict/log/regress_log_031_recovery_conflict > > we see: > > timed out waiting for match: (?^:User was holding a relation lock for too long) at /Users/admin/pgsql/src/test/recovery/t/031_recovery_conflict.plline 311. > > That looks indeed completely unrelated to this patch. Yes, that's what I suspected. The patch passes all tests now :) I've marked the CF entry as "Ready for Committer". Jim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: