Re: Error codes revisited
От | greg@turnstep.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Error codes revisited |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cc265fea25d053ab227eeb2fbad5524a@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Error codes revisited (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > The *last* thing we need is a half-baked stopgap solution that we'll > have to be backwards-compatible with forevermore. Fix it right or > don't do it at all, is MHO. I agree. > There is still barely enough time to do the long-threatened protocol > revision for 7.4, if we suck it up and get started on that now. I've > been avoiding the issue myself, because it seems generally boring and > thankless work, but maybe it's time to face up to it? Definitely. Sure seems to be a lot involved, looking at the TODO page. Which brings up another question - if a protocol change doesn't warrant a bump to 8.0, what does? :) - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200303040645 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html iD8DBQE+ZC1LvJuQZxSWSsgRAkJLAKDUE54ZELrPc4ASqEtwUCk7CYJH/ACfZ7nQ bLRqMde1T9MDjzmejF+PBis= =Plww -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: