Re: Killing Processes
От | Thomas F.O'Connell |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Killing Processes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cbf589c2fd04e34b3b01281c64a0d6fa@sitening.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Killing Processes (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Oops. That's right. I was relying on memory, which is less reliable than man. Fortunately, I always consult man before killing... :P -tfo -- Thomas F. O'Connell Co-Founder, Information Architect Sitening, LLC Strategic Open Source: Open Your i™ http://www.sitening.com/ 110 30th Avenue North, Suite 6 Nashville, TN 37203-6320 615-260-0005 On Apr 23, 2005, at 11:16 AM, Michael Fuhr wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 10:58:46AM -0500, Thomas F.O'Connell wrote: >> >> It is generally not recommended that you kill processes with anything >> stronger than HUP, which is (I believe) what kill sends by default. > > kill usually sends TERM by default, not HUP. > > (I say "usually" only because I haven't personally examined every > implementation of kill in existence. Every one I've used sends > TERM by default and I haven't heard of any that work otherwise.)
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: