Re: Add tracking of backend memory allocated to pg_stat_activity
От | Reid Thompson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add tracking of backend memory allocated to pg_stat_activity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cbe20863f2d24ddede079042291f672123446f16.camel@crunchydata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add tracking of backend memory allocated to pg_stat_activity (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add tracking of backend memory allocated to pg_stat_activity
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 09:18 -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2022-12-02 11:09:30 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: > > It appears to me that Postmaster populates the local variable that > > *my_allocated_bytes points to. That allocation is passed to forked > > children, and if not zeroed out, will be double counted as part of > > the child allocation. Is this invalid? > > I don't think we should count allocations made before > backend_status.c has > been initialized. > > Greetings, > > Andres Freund Hi, The intent was to capture and display all the memory allocated to the backends, for admins/users/max_total_backend_memory/others to utilize. Why should we ignore the allocations prior to backend_status.c? Thanks, Reid -- Reid Thompson Senior Software Engineer Crunchy Data, Inc. reid.thompson@crunchydata.com www.crunchydata.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: