Re: Ignore invalid indexes in pg_dump.
От | anarazel@anarazel.de |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Ignore invalid indexes in pg_dump. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cbaae57b-116e-49eb-aabc-ea4a2d200cff@email.android.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Ignore invalid indexes in pg_dump. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Ignore invalid indexes in pg_dump.
Re: Ignore invalid indexes in pg_dump. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> schrieb: >Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: >> Should I just patch pg_upgrade to remove the "indisvalid", skip >> "indisvalid" indexes, and backpatch it? Users should be using the >> version of pg_upgrade to match new pg_dump. Is there any case where >> they don't match? Do I still need to check for "indisready"? > >Yeah, if you can just ignore !indisvalid indexes that should work fine. >I see no need to look at indisready if you're doing that. You need to look at inisready in 9.2 since thats used for about to be dropped indexes. No? Andres --- Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: