Re: Support to define custom wait events for extensions
От | Masahiro Ikeda |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Support to define custom wait events for extensions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cb7d5257d1b1a25aa405c219732aaf8c@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Support to define custom wait events for extensions (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Support to define custom wait events for extensions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-07-13 09:12, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 05:46:31PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 04:52:38PM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote: >>> If the behavior is unexpected, we need to change the current code. >>> I have created a patch for the areas that I felt needed to be >>> changed. >>> - 0001-change-the-die-condition-in-generate-wait_event_type.patch >>> (In addition to the above, "$continue = ",\n";" doesn't appear to be >>> necessary.) >> >> die "wait event names must start with 'WAIT_EVENT_'" >> if ( $trimmedwaiteventname eq $waiteventenumname >> - && $waiteventenumname !~ /^LWLock/ >> - && $waiteventenumname !~ /^Lock/); >> - $continue = ",\n"; >> + && $waitclassname !~ /^WaitEventLWLock$/ >> + && $waitclassname !~ /^WaitEventLock$/); >> >> Indeed, this looks wrong as-is. $waiteventenumname refers to the >> names of the enum elements, so we could just apply a filter based on >> the class names in full. The second check in for the generation of >> the c/h files uses the class names. > > At the end, I have gone with an event simpler way and removed the > checks for LWLock and Lock as their hardcoded values marked as DOCONLY > satisfy this check. The second check when generating the C and header > code has also been simplified a bit to use an exact match with the > class name. Thanks for your quick response. I'll rebase for the commit. Regards, -- Masahiro Ikeda NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: