Re: Greatest Common Divisor
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Greatest Common Divisor |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cb704408-6589-00a3-3dc5-4dcb08d94819@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Greatest Common Divisor (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Greatest Common Divisor
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-01-03 16:22, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 2020-01-02 15:50, Dean Rasheed wrote: >>> Out of curiosity, what was the original use-case for this? > >> Yeah, I'm wondering, is this useful for any typical analytics or >> business application? Otherwise, abstract algebra functionality seems a >> bit out of scope. > > Nobody complained when we added sinh, cosh, tanh, asinh, acosh, atanh > last year, so I'm feeling skeptical of claims that gcd should be out > of scope. Geometry is generally in scope, though, for Postgres specifically and for databases in general. Abstract algebra is not in scope, so far, and we still haven't been told the use case for this. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: