Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres?
От | Doug Bloebaum |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | caa2de8a0511011022t58a5a7a0s4446083a50928900@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres? ("Welty, Richard" <richard.welty@bankofamerica.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 11/1/05, Welty, Richard <richard.welty@bankofamerica.com> wrote: > > Scott Marlowe writes: > > and PostgreSQL enjoys a MUCH richer and easier to use > >set of utilities. I find psql to be much much easier to drive than > >oracle's SQL*PLus, which makes my head hurt. > > i have to use the informix dbaccess tool here at the day job a lot. > hate it. psql is so much nicer... > > i do not have fond memories of SQL*Plus, either. Yes, sqlplus looks especially bad once you're used to banging around in psql. Although, I recently discovered rlwrap (a generic readline wrapper) which makes sqlplus almost tolerable. It's the best thing to happen to sqlplus since... well, since "quit" I suppose. http://www.dizwell.com/oracle/articles/cli_history.html
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: