Re: Postgresql Hardware
| От | Psicopunk |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Postgresql Hardware |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | ca397743-6e21-4a61-880b-1072ccd69616@w10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Postgresql Hardware (Psicopunk <gil.nunes.resende@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Postgresql Hardware
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 11 Set, 17:59, vi...@khera.org (Vick Khera) wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Psicopunk <gil.nunes.rese...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What HW is more important to postgresql performance? > > Assuming that the database will have some load, what hardware must i > > buy? > > Generally, you put as much RAM as you can afford, and then buy the > fastest disks you can afford. > > Any advice beyond that will depend on taking exact measurements of > your application load and finding the bottlenecks and then increasing > performance at those points. Usually it is I/O that limits you, so > you can also optimize your application by adjusting your schema design > and your queries. > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-gene...@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general How can i take some measurements to understand what bottlenecks will appear? This application will be always writing to database. How can i measure the load at the database? Can i tune the database depending on the hardware that i will buy? Thanks for your help. Best regards.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: