Re: [PATCH] Added TRANSFORM FOR for COMMENT tab completion
От | Ken Kato |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Added TRANSFORM FOR for COMMENT tab completion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c96921ff0e5c0d92495433556c6ef029@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Added TRANSFORM FOR for COMMENT tab completion (Shinya Kato <Shinya11.Kato@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Added TRANSFORM FOR for COMMENT tab completion
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2021-10-15 13:29 に Shinya Kato さんは書きました: > On 2021-10-14 14:30, katouknl wrote: >>> It is very good, but it seems to me that there are some >>> tab-completion >>> missing in COMMENT command. >>> For example, >>> - CONSTRAINT ... ON DOMAIN >>> - OPERATOR CLASS >>> - OPERATOR FAMILY >>> - POLICY ... ON >>> - [PROCEDURAL] >>> - RULE ... ON >>> - TRIGGER ... ON >>> >>> I think these tab-comletion also can be improved and it's a good >>> timing for that. >> >> Thank you for the comments! >> >> I fixed where you pointed out. > Thank you for the update! > I tried "COMMENT ON OPERATOR ...", and an operator seemed to be > complemented with double quotation marks. > However, it caused the COMMENT command to fail. > --- > postgres=# COMMENT ON OPERATOR "+" (integer, integer) IS 'test_fail'; > ERROR: syntax error at or near "(" > LINE 1: COMMENT ON OPERATOR "+" (integer, integer) IS 'test_fail'; > postgres=# COMMENT ON OPERATOR + (integer, integer) IS 'test_success'; > COMMENT > --- > > So, I think as with \do command, you do not need to complete the > operators. > Do you think? Thank you for the further comments! I fixed so that it doesn't complete the operators anymore. It only completes with CLASS and FAMILY. Also, I updated TEXT SEARCH. It completes object names for each one of CONFIGURATION, DICTIONARY, PARSER, and TEMPLATE. -- Best wishes, Ken Kato Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: