Re: Why HDD performance is better than SSD in this case
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why HDD performance is better than SSD in this case |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c8c36fe8-e1a8-694a-70db-72f32bcda781@catalyst.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why HDD performance is better than SSD in this case (Neto pr <netopr9@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi Neto, In a great piece of timing my new experimental SSD arrived (WD Black 500 G 3D NAND MVME) [1]. Doing some runs of query 9: - default config: 7 minutes - work_mem=1G, max_parallel_workers_per_gather=4: 3-4 minutes Increasing either of these much more got me OOM errors (16 G of ram). Anyway, enjoy your benchmarking! Cheers Mark [1] Yeah - I know this is a 'do not use me in production' type of SSD. It is however fine for prototyping and DSS scenario run type use. On 20/07/18 12:52, Neto pr wrote: > > Mark, > This query 9 is very hard, see my results for other queries (attached > - test with secondary index and without secondary index - only primary > keys), the SSD always wins in performance. > Only for this query that he was the loser, so I put this topic in the list. > > Today I will not be able to check your test information in more > detail, but I will return with more information soon. > > Best Regards > Neto > > > > >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: