Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL

On 2017/01/11 8:02, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 01/09/2017 05:54 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote:
>>> I do wonder if there are parts of the codebase that would be much better
>>> suited to a language other than C, and could reasonably be ported.
>>> Especially if that could be done in such a way that the net result is still
>>> C code so we're not adding dependencies to non developers (similar to
>>> bison).
>>>
>>> Extensions are a step in that direction, but they're ultimately not core
>>> Postgres (which is a different issue).
>>
>> I think this is a great idea!
>>
>> That way the amount of C code could be reduced over time,
>> while safely extending the official version with new functionality on
>> the surface,
>> without increasing the amount of C code.
> 
> Even if you don't ever end up touching core Postgres, being able to
> write extensions in languages other than C (like, full-featured
> extensions) would be its own benefit.
> 
> Why not start there?  That is, assuming that Joel has gobs of time to
> work on this?  For that matter, I know that Jeff Davis is quite fond of
> Rust.

It seems someone tried (perhaps ran out of steam, unfortunately):

* Postgres extensions written in Rust *
https://github.com/thehydroimpulse/postgres-extension.rs

Thanks,
Amit