[HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | [HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | c8089bcd-e5f9-3a05-136a-f183207bb5f9@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check
Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
AFAICT, unlike the pg_regress checks, which in the installcheck case run against a running instance of postgres, for TAP tests the only difference is that that for the check case a temp install is done, possibly with some extra contrib modules. Is that correct? If is is, why aren't we providing an installcheck target for tests like recover. In at least one case (buildfarmn jacana) installs are quite expensive (2 or 3 minutes) and if they are pointless as seems to be the case here why can't we just avoid them? cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: