[HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема [HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check
Дата
Msg-id c8089bcd-e5f9-3a05-136a-f183207bb5f9@2ndQuadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
AFAICT, unlike the pg_regress checks, which in the installcheck case run
against a running instance of postgres, for TAP tests the only
difference is that that for the check case a temp install is done,
possibly with some extra contrib modules. Is that correct? If is is, why
aren't we providing an installcheck target for tests like recover. In at
least one case (buildfarmn jacana) installs are quite expensive (2 or 3
minutes) and if they are pointless as seems to be the case here why
can't we just avoid them?


cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Petr Jelinek
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] valgrind error in subscription code
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders