Re: Docbook 5.x
От | Alexander Law |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Docbook 5.x |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c7e45017-c918-d2ec-a7e5-f696e41c5314@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Docbook 5.x (Alexander Law <exclusion@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Docbook 5.x
Re: Docbook 5.x |
Список | pgsql-docs |
Hello, Peter. >>> Should we now compare DSSSL outputs with XSLT? >>> I had some success with it before. See my letter: >>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/57712848.7060306%40gmail.com >>> Those xslt's (see xhtml-like-dsssl.patch) can help us to see all the >>> differences and to decide which customizations to keep. >> It looks like the idea there is to whack the XSLT stylesheets until the >> output looks exactly like the DSSSL output? I'm not sure that's >> terribly useful. It would probably be a lot of work, which we'll just >> end up removing eventually. I'd rather just fix any formatting issues >> we find and move forward. > That work is done already and it's results are countable and > observable differences. (See comments in the xslt.) > For example, with DSSSL we don't get a chapter TOC when the chapter > contains only one sect1 (with XSLT we get the TOC with the one item). > We also had subtoc for sect1/refentry and sect1/simplesect, but with > XSLT it's absent. > So if all such differences are not important, let's move forward. > Please look at the http://oc.postgrespro.ru/index.php/s/ttJyMDLr8Xr1HTu/download where I have gathered together all the significant differences, that we have between DSSSL and XSLT outputs. I have marked red the differences that I would consider as negative. Let's decide which ones are acceptable and which we need to eliminate. Best regards, Alexander
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: