Re: Docbook 5.x

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Law
Тема Re: Docbook 5.x
Дата
Msg-id c7e45017-c918-d2ec-a7e5-f696e41c5314@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Docbook 5.x  (Alexander Law <exclusion@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Docbook 5.x  (Jürgen Purtz <juergen@purtz.de>)
Re: Docbook 5.x  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-docs
Hello, Peter.
>>> Should we now compare DSSSL outputs with XSLT?
>>> I had some success with it before. See my letter:
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/57712848.7060306%40gmail.com
>>> Those xslt's (see xhtml-like-dsssl.patch) can help us to see all the
>>> differences and to decide which customizations to keep.
>> It looks like the idea there is to whack the XSLT stylesheets until the
>> output looks exactly like the DSSSL output?  I'm not sure that's
>> terribly useful.  It would probably be a lot of work, which we'll just
>> end up removing eventually.  I'd rather just fix any formatting issues
>> we find and move forward.
> That work is done already and it's results are countable and
> observable differences. (See comments in the xslt.)
> For example, with DSSSL we don't get a chapter TOC when the chapter
> contains only one sect1 (with XSLT we get the TOC with the one item).
> We also had subtoc for sect1/refentry and sect1/simplesect, but with
> XSLT it's absent.
> So if all such differences are not important, let's move forward.
>
Please look at the
http://oc.postgrespro.ru/index.php/s/ttJyMDLr8Xr1HTu/download
where I have gathered together all the significant differences, that we
have between DSSSL and XSLT outputs.
I have marked red the differences that I would consider as negative.
Let's decide which ones are acceptable and which we need to eliminate.

Best regards,
Alexander



В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Invalid field name in RLS description
Следующее
От: Jürgen Purtz
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Docbook 5.x