Re: pg_upgrade should truncate/remove its logs before running
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade should truncate/remove its logs before running |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c7615cf3-621a-7fc4-79ec-6b2554cd5b68@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade should truncate/remove its logs before running (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade should truncate/remove its logs before running
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 16.12.21 02:39, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 04:13:10PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 05:04:54PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>> The directory name needs to be predictable somehow, or maybe optionally >>> set as a parameter. Having just a timestamped directory name would make >>> life annoying for a poor buildfarm maintainer. Also, please don't change >>> anything before I have a chance to adjust the buildfarm code to what is >>> going to be done. >> >> Feel free to suggest the desirable behavior. >> It could write to pg_upgrade.log/* and refuse to run if the dir already exists. > > Andrew's point looks rather sensible to me. So, this stuff should > have a predictable name (pg_upgrade.log, pg_upgrade_log or upgrade_log > would be fine). But I would also add an option to be able to define a > custom log path. The latter would be useful for the regression tests > so as everything gets could get redirected to a path already filtered > out. Could we make it write just one log file? Is having multiple log files better?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: