Re: Push down more full joins in postgres_fdw
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Push down more full joins in postgres_fdw |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c73e2a65-b851-bd2c-e6b6-2a7d5f5fbdbf@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Push down more full joins in postgres_fdw (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016/09/27 13:33, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: I wrote: >>>>>> ISTM that the use of the same RTI for subqueries in multi-levels in a >>>>>> remote >>>>>> SQL makes the SQL a bit difficult to read. How about using the >>>>>> position >>>>>> of >>>>>> the join rel in join_rel_list, (more precisely, the position plus >>>>>> list_length(root->parse->rtable)), instead? I wrote: >> The join rel is appended to the end of the list, so I was thinking to get >> the position info by list_length during postgresGetForeignJoinPaths. > That's true only when the paths are being added to a newly created > joinrel. But that's not true always. We may add paths with different > joining order to an existing joinrel, in which case list_length would > not give its position. Am I missing something? I think you are right, but postgresGetForeignJoinPaths only allows us to add a foreign join path to a newly created joinrel. The reason is because that routine skips all its work after the first call for that joinrel, by checking to see if joinrel->fdw_private is not NULL. So, I think it's reasonable to get the position by list_length in that routine. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: