Re: BUG #3699: Fails to compile DTrace Support
От | Lee Packham |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #3699: Fails to compile DTrace Support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c5d00b200710260708xcf60ad0t29e9b103a6d7abb@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #3699: Fails to compile DTrace Support (Robert Lor <Robert.Lor@Sun.COM>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
The only thing I couldn't do was sort out the makefile to auto generate the header file. So the patch has a pre-built header file. I don't know Make well, enough. Sorry. But yeah - I was pretty annoyed they broke the -G parameter (i.e. didn't include it at all. Cheers, Lee. On 10/26/07, Robert Lor <Robert.Lor@sun.com> wrote: > From: Lee Packham <lpackham@gmail.com> > > > I have built a patch to enable a working DTrace on OSX with Postgres 8.2.5. > > Basically the problem is that the dtrace command on OSX doesn't have > > the -G > > parameter - so you have to use the newer -h method to produce a header > > file. > > > > It bothers me that the Apple's Dtrace port doesn't have the -G flag. We chose the current approach for simplicity and atthe same time allowing us to easily introduce a generic framework so other OSes can plug in a similar tool if needed. Ihave yet to review your patch in detail, but I hope it doesn't break this generic framework. More later... > > -Robert >
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: