Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c5a2de9d-ded2-5876-5420-d1f6190ff352@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?
Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/5/19 1:14 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:48 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> +1 for raising the default substantially. In my experience, and it >> seems others are in a similar place, nobody ever gets into trouble >> because the default is too high, but sometimes people get in trouble >> because the default is too low. > > Does anyone want to make an argument against the idea of raising the > default? They should speak up now. > I don't know. On the one hand I don't feel very strongly about this change, and I have no intention to block it (because in most cases I do actually increase the value anyway). I wonder if those with small systems will be happy about it, though. But on the other hand it feels a bit weird that we increase this one value and leave all the other (also very conservative) defaults alone. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: