Re: Dubugging an intermittent foreign key insert error with csvlog
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Dubugging an intermittent foreign key insert error with csvlog |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c59e0bb6-2776-9c73-1c2a-84866974fb10@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Dubugging an intermittent foreign key insert error with csvlog (Jeff Ross <jross@openvistas.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 9/16/19 3:16 PM, Jeff Ross wrote: > On 9/16/19 4:07 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: >> On 9/16/19 1:46 PM, Jeff Ross wrote: > >>> >>> The csvlog snip shows what I believe are 2 simultaneous but separate >>> sessions and the session that attempts to insert into the cargo_det >>> table is not the same session that inserted into the load_det table. >>> That's what my hunch is but what is unclear to me is if those >>> separate sessions are also in separate transactions. >> >> To me it looks like the INSERT into load_det and into cargo_det are >> occurring in the same transaction(934281062). The part that would >> concern me is that: >> >> select last_value from load_det_id_seq >> >> occurs in different transactions and sessions. From here: >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/sql-createsequence.html >> >> "Also, last_value will reflect the latest value reserved by any >> session, whether or not it has yet been returned by nextval." >> >> Especially as the error is coming from a different >> transaction(934281063) and session then the INSERTs. I'm guessing that >> there is cross talk on the sequence number fetch and application to >> cargo_det. >> > > Thank you Adrian--I think my hunch was basically correct then. Now all > I need to do is figure out why we have multiple sessions and > transactions. Or it might be time to skip ahead and get rid of the > last_value query. Yes, RETURNING makes this sort of thing so much easier it pays to invest the time in making it part of the query. > > Jeff > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: