Re: limit 1 on view never finishes
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: limit 1 on view never finishes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c4ef50c0-1253-e0b7-477d-f1b101dc2865@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | limit 1 on view never finishes (Craig James <cjames@emolecules.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 10/27/16 3:46 PM, Craig James wrote: > > Limit (cost=3264.63..7193.14 rows=1 width=4) > -> Nested Loop (cost=3264.63..428658697.57 rows=109114 width=4) > Join Filter: (rv.version_id = sample.version_id) > -> Index Only Scan Backward using version_pkey on version rv > (cost=0.42..6812.85 rows=261895 width=4) > -> Materialize (cost=3264.21..5992.06 rows=109114 width=4) > -> HashAggregate (cost=3264.21..4355.35 rows=109114 > width=4) > -> Seq Scan on sample (cost=0.00..2991.37 > rows=109137 width=4) > > Why would this trivial query run forever at 100% CPU? My bet is that there's a lot of rows in version that have a higher version than what's in sample. That means a lot of repeated scans through the tuplestore underneath the Materialize node. If you can remove duplicates from sample and get rid of the DISTINCT, this will probably get a better plan. If you can't do that then you could try changing the JOIN to an IN: SELECT ... FROM sample WHERE version_id IN (SELECT version_id FROM sample) -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: