RE: Sequences part 2
От | Karl Martin Skoldebrand |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Sequences part 2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c4eea2e934cf43e9ae25faaf71e39f85@UKEXCHMBX003.TechMahindra.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sequences part 2 (Karsten Hilbert <Karsten.Hilbert@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> Yes, I'm fairly aware of this. However the application the database table belongs to seems to rely on a specific orderin the database. I.e. if I just add value to the table they end up, possibly due to how the application is coded inan undesireable spot on the web page. > That is why I wanted them to be inserted with the previous records. rename the table install a view with the name of the table and appropriate triggers and/or rules between app and database enforcing whateverquestionable assumptions the app thinks it needs -- if at all logically possible -------------- Hmm, that could be a possible avenue. The true horror of the database table is that it contains mixed data, so it could possibly be "easier" to just remodel thedatabase table (split it into several) for this function. If things are in fact the way they look to us at the moment.Either way it's not a quick fix for someone fairly inexperienced with PostgreSQL and having a couple of days to holiday. //Martin S ============================================================================================================================ Disclaimer: This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindrapolicy statement, you may review the policy at http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html <http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html>externally http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html <http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html>internally within TechMahindra. ============================================================================================================================
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: