Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Postgres replaces SQLite as well as it replacesOracle?
От | Darren Duncan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Postgres replaces SQLite as well as it replacesOracle? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c3ec6e4a-4739-27a5-b7fc-a2c3f92d1d17@darrenduncan.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [pgsql-advocacy] Postgres replaces SQLite as well as it replaces Oracle? (Joshua Kramer <joskra42.list@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Well there are a variety of definitions of "embedded". You could probably run SQLite on a device that has a total of 1MB of RAM or similar. -- Darren Duncan On 2017-02-24 5:12 PM, Joshua Kramer wrote: > Hello, > > Has anyone done articles or advocacy for Postgres in embedded applications? > > I am fooling around with Home Assistant on a Raspberry Pi. This is a > Python 3 app that is normally backed by SQLite. But it has issues > because often times more than one process wants to write to the > database, and SQLite doesn't do that well. I found a handy guide on > replacing SQLite with PG in this application: > > https://community.home-assistant.io/t/howto-postgresql-on-raspberry-pi-all-in-one-installer/5527/21 > > Two things I noticed right off the bat. The UI of HomeAssistant is > MUCH faster using PG than it is using SQLite. We're talking 5 seconds > for a page refresh vs half a second. Second, Postgres is tiny! The > whole stack- OS, Postgres, HASS server- takes up a whopping 67 MB of > RAM. > > It'll be interesting to see how these stats change as I leave the > thing running for months on end. > > Cheers! > -JK
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: