Re: Wild idea: 9.0?
От | usleepless@gmail.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wild idea: 9.0? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c39ec84c0704231503r2c920dbbw638e304d4879180f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Wild idea: 9.0? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Josh, List, On 4/23/07, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > Hackers, > > I was thinking about the upcoming release on my 32-hour epic airplane ordeal, > and realizing that it changes PostgreSQL in a lot of ways. Between major > improvements to performance, major changes to the file format, and changes to > implicit conversions breaking backwards compatibility, our new ability to > more-or-less stick to deadlines ... > > ... should this be 9.0 instead of 8.3? > > Seems like it'd be both an annoucement of how far we've come, as well as a > warning to users that the 8.2-->9.0 upgrade could be painful. And that some > of our more radical features in the new version could have some rough edges. as a casual user, only subscribed to this list, i think you should really consider it. a bunch of problems due toa minor-release-number upgrade would come as a suprise. a major-release-number- upgrade i would investigate more thorough. regards, usleep
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: