Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c325bf61-d8f9-a496-35c7-c353d06031b4@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c) (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021/07/23 20:07, Ranier Vilela wrote: > Em sex., 23 de jul. de 2021 às 07:02, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com <mailto:aleksander@timescale.com>>escreveu: > > Hi hackers, > > The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: > make installcheck-world: tested, passed > Implements feature: tested, passed > Spec compliant: tested, passed > Documentation: tested, passed > > The patch was tested on MacOS against master `80ba4bb3`. > > The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer > > > The second patch seems fine too. I'm attaching both patches to trigger cfbot and to double-check them. > > Thanks Aleksander, for reviewing this. I looked at these patches because they are marked as ready for committer. They don't change any actual behavior, but look valid to me in term of coding. Barring any objection, I will commit them. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: