Re: tuplesort Generation memory contexts don't play nicely with index builds
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tuplesort Generation memory contexts don't play nicely with index builds |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c31ffe1c-77f7-5568-f1ba-59c3f6525a4d@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tuplesort Generation memory contexts don't play nicely with index builds (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/6/22 23:15, Tom Lane wrote: > David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, 7 Jul 2022 at 13:41, John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> Hmm, the commit appeared on git.postgresql.org, but apparently not in >>> my email nor the list archives. > >> Strange. I'd suspect a temporary hiccup in whatever code pushes the >> commits onto the mailing list, but I see that my fe3caa143 from >> yesterday was also missed. > > Caught in list moderation maybe? Actually, yes they are: 8<----------------------- Date: 2022-07-06 07:41:02 List: pgsql-committers Reason: sender is not a confirmed email address From: drowley(at)postgresql(dot)org Size: 4890 bytes Subject: pgsql: Remove size increase in ExprEvalStep caused by hashed saops Date: 2022-07-06 20:14:25 List: pgsql-committers Reason: sender is not a confirmed email address Spam score: -7.1 From: drowley(at)postgresql(dot)org Size: 4703 bytes Subject: pgsql: Overload index_form_tuple to allow the memory context to be supp 8<----------------------- (I manually did the (at) and (dot) obfuscation) I don't ordinarily moderate the pgsql-committers list, and don't know offhand who does, so am a bit hesitant to approve them myself. But perhaps I should? I guess another good question is why the email address no longer confirmed... -- Joe Conway RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: