Re: Transactional DDL
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Transactional DDL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c2d9e70e0706021551u294480advf446fece78e41962@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Transactional DDL (Russ Brown <pickscrape@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> > On 6/2/07, *Jasbinder Singh Bali* <jsbali@gmail.com > > <mailto:jsbali@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > On 6/2/07, *Michael Glaesemann* < grzm@seespotcode.net > > <mailto:grzm@seespotcode.net>> wrote: > > > > On Jun 2, 2007, at 11:08 , Harpreet Dhaliwal wrote: > > > > > Whats so novel about postgresql here? > > > This would happen in any RDBMS. right? > > > You induced divide by zero exception that crashed the whole > > > transaction and it did not create the table bar? > > > > No, it doesn't > then informix is better than oracle in this point. last time i try this on informix it did the right thing... sadly enough, i don't have an informix database at hand to confirm if my memory has no corrupted indexes ;) -- regards, Jaime Casanova "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." Richard Cook
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: