Re: A question about sequences and backup/restore cycles
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A question about sequences and backup/restore cycles |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c2a2c79f-b004-81b7-9a51-1fbc8bc341e2@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | A question about sequences and backup/restore cycles (stan <stanb@panix.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/21/19 5:13 PM, stan wrote: > > I typically design a system with primary keys defined, like this: > > > CREATE TABLE employee ( > employee_key integer DEFAULT nextval('employee_key_serial') > PRIMARY KEY , > > I use scripts to build the database structures and load the data. I am > careful to get the dependencies in the correct order, so that the keys later > structures depend on already exist. > > Today I was going over the design for the current project with a friend, > whose expertise i respect. he said that he had issues on a system designed > by an OEM that had dependencies on keys developed from sequences after a > backup/restore cycle, > > Will I potentially have these issues? If so, what can I do different to > avoid this being an issue? It is not clear to me what you are doing: 1) Are you using pg_dump/pg_restore to populate a database? If so it will take care of the dependencies. 2) Are you using a home built method to populate the database? In that case you take responsibility for dependencies. > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: