Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c23c3355-e7a3-4fbe-2521-32d5944b48b3@wi3ck.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/29/21 2:04 PM, Julien Rouhaud wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:46:12AM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote: >> > I don't have a ready example of such an extension, but if we ever would >> > convert the backend parts of Slony into an extension, it would be one. > FWIW I have an example of such an extension: powa-archivist extension > script runs an anonymous block code and creates if needed a custom > wrapper to emulate the current_setting(text, boolean) variant that > doesn't exist on pre-pg96 servers. > Thank you! I presume that pg_upgrade on a database with that extension installed would silently succeed and have the pg_catalog as well as public (or wherever) version of that function present. Regards, Jan -- Jan Wieck
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: