Re: SQL/JSON: FOR ORDINALITY bug
От | Erik Rijkers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQL/JSON: FOR ORDINALITY bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c225a643-ca4c-a94d-94b5-1430bc9ca905@xs4all.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SQL/JSON: FOR ORDINALITY bug (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: SQL/JSON: FOR ORDINALITY bug
Re: SQL/JSON: FOR ORDINALITY bug |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Op 04-05-2022 om 21:12 schreef Andrew Dunstan: > >>>> >>>> I don't see how rowseq can be anything but 1. Each invocation of >> >> >> After some further experimentation, I now think you must be right, David. >> >> Also, looking at the DB2 docs: >> https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/i/7.2?topic=data-using-json-table >> (see especially under 'Handling nested information') >> >> There, I gathered some example data + statements where one is the case >> at hand. I also made them runnable under postgres (attached). >> >> I thought that was an instructive example, with those >> 'outer_ordinality' and 'inner_ordinality' columns. >> >> > > Yeah, I just reviewed the latest version of that page (7.5) and the > example seems fairly plain that we are doing the right thing, or if not > we're in pretty good company, so I guess this is probably a false alarm. > Looks like ordinality is for the number of the element produced by the > path expression. So a path of 'lax $' should just produce ordinality of > 1 in each case, while a path of 'lax $[*]' will produce increasing > ordinality for each element of the root array. Agreed. You've probably noticed then that on that same page under 'Sibling Nesting' is a statement that gives a 13-row resultset on DB2 whereas in 15devel that statement yields just 10 rows. I don't know which is correct. Erik > > > cheers > > > andrew > > -- > Andrew Dunstan > EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: