Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table

Hi Alvaro,

On 12/29/2017 12:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> This seems to work pretty well, much to my surprise.  I was a bit scared
> of adding a new deptype, but actually the only affected code is
> findDependentObjects() and the semantics of the new type is a subset of
> the existing DEPTYPE_INTERNAL, so I think it's okay.  I need to fill in
> its description in docs and comments though -- I left it out because the
> real difference between INTERNAL and INTERNAL_AUTO is not something that
> is covered by the existing description of INTERNAL, so maybe I'll need
> to expand that one.
> 
> This version includes the fixes I posted as "delta" to the problems
> Jesper reported, as well as fixes to the ones reported by Amit.  It's
> looking pretty good to me -- I'm seeing it as a candidate to commit
> early in the upcoming commitfest.
> 

indexing.sql contains a \di command which list the owner of the db, so 
make check-world fails.

Best regards,
  Jesper