Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes

On 3/28/25 12:59, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 1:32 PM Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think this is going to be CPU-consuming.  I don't think this
> is going to be measurable.  This patch introduces one additional pass
> over array of OrArgIndexMatch'es, and qsort of them.  I think I've
> seen places where we spend quadratic time over the number of
> OR-clauses.  Even calls of match_index_to_operand() for every clause
> and every index look way more expensive.
Ok, I have no more objections.

> I think my patch gives better determinism too.  For instance, output
> order doesn't depend on order of indexes in rel->indexlist.
Nice!

-- 
regards, Andrei Lepikhov