Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT

On 05/20/2018 12:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> Well that seems to have crashed and burned badly. I'm just going to
>> disable ecpg checks on this animal as suggested upthread.
> Hmm ... this might be too much of a coincidence, but I can't help noticing
> that the places that are going south with -D__USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO are
> pretty nearly the same ones I just pointed to in
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/21670.1526769114@sss.pgh.pa.us
> as using "%lf".  I'd supposed that that was mostly compulsive neatnik-ism,
> but is it possible that mingw's "ansi stdio" library is actually
> sensitive to that?
>
>             


Yeah, it sure is. With that applied ecpg-check actually passes on 
frogmouth. If you apply it to all the live branches I'll re-enable the 
tests.

cheers

andrew