Re: typos
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: typos |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c0824e0c-3f75-e8d6-3ce6-8f55a1c75c1e@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: typos (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03.01.23 09:41, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 01:03:01PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: >> One minor comment: >> - spoken in Belgium (BE), with a <acronym>UTF-8</acronym> character set >> + spoken in Belgium (BE), with a <acronym>UTF</acronym>-8 character set >> >> Shouldn't this be <acronym>UTF8</acronym> as we are using in func.sgml? > > Yeah, I was wondering as well why this change is not worse, which is > why I left it out of 33ab0a2. There is an acronym for UTF in > acronym.sgml, which makes sense to me, but that's the only place where > this is used. To add more on top of that, the docs basically need > only UTF8, and we have three references to UTF-16, none of them using > the <acronym> markup. The thing is called "UTF-8". Here, we are not talking about the PostgreSQL identifier.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: