Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j
От | Ron |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c05ff702-2573-ebb4-dfdd-66150ea2138b@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j ("Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j
Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 5/23/23 12:19, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > On 2023-05-22 21:10:48 -0500, Ron wrote: >> On 5/22/23 18:42, Tom Lane wrote: >>> It looks like the assumption was that issuing link() >>> requests in parallel wouldn't help much but just swamp your disk >>> if they're all on the same filesystem. >>> Maybe that could use rethinking, not sure. >> It does need rethinking in the era of VMs and SANs. /var/lib/pgsql/15 is >> going to be on a different LUN from /var/lib/pgsql/9.6 > You can't hardlink between different file systems. We'd never hardlink. Eliminates the ability to return to the old system if something goes wrong. -- Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: