Good point... I'll try this
On 6/2/21 2:32 PM, Scott Ribe wrote:
>> On Jun 2, 2021, at 2:00 PM, <dave@davebolt.co.uk> <dave@davebolt.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> For the other column I’m guessing more work has to be done finding the length for each row. Maybe maintaining a
columncontaining the current length for each row would help?
> or a functional index
>