Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace
От | Erik Rijkers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c004ff29-506c-18df-851d-08b6494c0f40@xs4all.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace (Gilles Darold <gilles@darold.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/3/21 1:26 PM, Gilles Darold wrote: > Le 03/08/2021 à 11:45, Gilles Darold a écrit : >> Actually I just found that the regexp_like() function doesn't support >> the start parameter which is something we should support. I saw that >> Oracle do not support it but DB2 does and I think we should also >> support it. I will post a new version of the patch once it is done. > +1 I for one am in favor of this 'start'-argument addition. Slightly harder usage, but more precise manipulation. Erik Rijkers > > Here is a new version of the patch that adds the start parameter to > regexp_like() function but while I'm adding support to this parameter it > become less obvious for me that we should implement it. However feel > free to not use this version if you think that adding the start > parameter has no real interest. > > > Best regards, >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: