Re: Are we losing momentum?
От | Sailesh Krishnamurthy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | bxyadeg1m3j.fsf@datafix.CS.Berkeley.EDU обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Are we losing momentum? ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Are we losing momentum?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "scott" == scott marlowe <scott.marlowe> writes: scott> Plus the fact that the underlying pg_ tables are stable scott> from release to release makes it a bit awkwardto upgrade scott> the servers they play on. Most of them have gone ahead and scott> created views that give thema consistent view of the parts scott> of the database they need. This is exactly the reason why in db2 _no_ guarantees are made regarding the constancy of the system catalogs (that are in the SYSIBM schema). Instead, the equivalent views (in the SYSCAT schema) are _never_ broken (whether in a point release or a new version). In fact, the SYSCAT views correspond to the ISO SQL standard. -- Pip-pip Sailesh http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: