Re: this is in plain text (row level locks)
От | Sailesh Krishnamurthy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: this is in plain text (row level locks) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | bxy1xwfo9r1.fsf@datafix.cs.berkeley.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: this is in plain text (row level locks) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: this is in plain text (row level locks)
Re: this is in plain text (row level locks) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: Tom> Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh@cs.berkeley.edu> writes: >> Why not have the traditional approach of a lock tablein shared >> memory, growing and shrinking as appropriate, Tom> Because we can't grow shared memory. Whatever size we get at Tom> startup is what we're stuck with. (I supposewe could try Tom> asking the kernel for additional segments, but there's every Tom> likelihood that that willfail.) We implemented a Shared Memory MemoryContext using OSSP libmm (used in Apache) for TelegraphCQ. If you think it's useful I can submit it as a patch. -- Pip-pip Sailesh http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: