Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

Olivier PRENANT wrote:

> Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> <SNIP>
>>> I am inclined to think yes.  It would prevent uglification of the code
>>> by not having to special-case Unixware.
>>>
>>> However, I was able to read the libc sources to confirm thread-safety.
>>> Because you can not see the source, would you try a threaded program 
>>> and
>>> see if calls to getpwuid from different threads return different
>>> pointer values?
>>
>>
>> It won't prove anything on MY box, as it is a UNIPROCESSOR, so the 
>> threads won't be dispatched at the same time.
>
>
> I have 2 bi-pro machines here both running unixware 7.1.3 I can make 
> tests if you want
>
>>
>> It's ok to assume thread-safety, as the SCO developer (Kean Johnston) 
>> asked the threads guys, and he said that the libc stuff is 
>> thread-safe so they don't have to have 2 different versions in libc.
>>
>> LER
>>
>>
>>
>
If any one can write a program that can prove anything (I can't), I'm 
willing to test it here on a bi-pro (bi PIII and bi-XEON with JT 
enabled) running uw713.
Maybe it will end the discussion and make a point in either way. So that 
we (you?) can move on with the other unixware patches.