Re: Big Memory Boxes and pgtune
| От | Jim Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Big Memory Boxes and pgtune |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | bf50d943-d1a3-e87d-a91d-376434481b22@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Big Memory Boxes and pgtune ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Big Memory Boxes and pgtune
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On 10/28/16 2:33 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > * A very high shared_buffers (in newer releases, it is not uncommon to > have many, many GB of) Keep in mind that you might get very poor results if shared_buffers is large, but not large enough to fit the entire database. In that case buffer replacement will be *extremely* expensive. Some operations will use a different buffer replacement strategy, so you might be OK if some of the database doesn't fit in shared buffers; that will depend a lot on your access patterns. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: