Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | bec4412e-de46-4a4c-bdab-337bcce0cfe0@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/08/02 4:02, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Amit Langote > <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> So is the latest patch posted upthread to process ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING >> using locally-defined unique indexes on leaf partitions something to consider? > > Yeah, for v11. OK. >> Maybe, not until we have cascading index definition working [1]? > > Not sure what that has to do with it. Hmm, scratch that. I was thinking that if all partitions had uniformly defined (unique) indexes, the behavior on specifying on conflict do nothing would be consistent across all partitions, but I guess that's not a really big win or anything. Thanks, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: