[GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Güttler
Тема [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?
Дата
Msg-id beaf38ba-294b-fa6b-3250-4ade59180c66@thomas-guettler.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?  (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>)
Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?  (Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>)
Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?  (Thomas Delrue <thomas@epistulae.net>)
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения 
Is is possible that PostgreSQL will replace these building blocks in the future?

 - redis (Caching)
 - rabbitmq (amqp)
 - s3 (Blob storage)

One question is "is it possible?", then next "is it feasible?"

I think it would be great if I could use PG only and if I could
avoid the other types of servers.

The benefit is not very obvious on the first sight. I think it will saves you
time, money and energy only in the long run.

What do you think?

Regards,
  Thomas Güttler


--
I am looking for feedback for my personal programming guidelines:
https://github.com/guettli/programming-guidelines

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] query planner placement of sort/limit w.r.t. joins
Следующее
От: Thomas Delrue
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?