[GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?
От | Thomas Güttler |
---|---|
Тема | [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | beaf38ba-294b-fa6b-3250-4ade59180c66@thomas-guettler.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?
Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future? Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future? Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future? |
Список | pgsql-general |
Is is possible that PostgreSQL will replace these building blocks in the future? - redis (Caching) - rabbitmq (amqp) - s3 (Blob storage) One question is "is it possible?", then next "is it feasible?" I think it would be great if I could use PG only and if I could avoid the other types of servers. The benefit is not very obvious on the first sight. I think it will saves you time, money and energy only in the long run. What do you think? Regards, Thomas Güttler -- I am looking for feedback for my personal programming guidelines: https://github.com/guettli/programming-guidelines
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: