Re: Timestamp weirdness
От | emergency.shower@gmail.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Timestamp weirdness |
Дата | |
Msg-id | bdf1a0980507251502f4b68af@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Timestamp weirdness (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Timestamp weirdness
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On 7/25/05, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > [...] > The difficulty with both 2 and 3 is that the driver has no very good way > of knowing whether it's writing to a timestamp with tz or one without. > We can know the parameter datatype we send, but if that gets converted > to the other type within the server, you're going to get burnt. If I TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE is implemented on the server as a (timestamp, time zone)-pair, the server should be able to cast TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE correctly to TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE as described in the SQL standard: From TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE to TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE TargetValue = SourceValue.UTC + SourceValue.TimeZone This cast is something like a conversion from a instance in time to a local time representation. In this case I would propose to send (if possible) timestamp and time zone to the server, no matter if we'll write a TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE or a TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE value. We could have some hope to get correct results then. Regards, Alex
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: