Re: pgsql: Revert removal of pre-7.4 documenation behavior mentions.
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Revert removal of pre-7.4 documenation behavior mentions. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | bddc86151002241033p5e1f72dfjd3d0817c27429c6b@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Revert removal of pre-7.4 documenation behavior mentions. (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Revert removal of pre-7.4
documenation behavior mentions.
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On 24 February 2010 17:07, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com> writes: >> > On 24 February 2010 15:54, Bruce Momjian <momjian@postgresql.org> wrote: >> > + Prior to <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> 7.3, writing just >> > + <type>timestamp</type> was equivalent to <type>timestamp with >> > + time zone</type>. This was changed for SQL compliance. >> >> > You may wish to say what exactly it was changed to. >> >> The previous para says that. > > Uh, well, the chart says it via syntax, which isn't exactly the same as > stating it, and this is particularly important because it is an odd > default. > > I have created an updated paragraph for that section: > > http://momjian.us/tmp/pgsql/datatype-datetime.html > > Note: The SQL standard requires that writing just timestamp be > equivalent to timestamp without time zone, and PostgreSQL honors that > behavior. (Releases prior to 7.3 treated it as timestamp with time > zone). > > Is that an improvement? > Yes, that's clearer, even if that information is inferred in the table above (my bad, I should have checked that too). Thanks, Thom
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: