Re: pgmemcache vs pgmemcached
| От | Thom Brown |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgmemcache vs pgmemcached |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | bddc86150911140149kece857eicd1d115df97d6c3a@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pgmemcache vs pgmemcached ("Valtonen, Hannu" <hannu.valtonen@f-secure.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pgmemcache vs pgmemcached
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Is there any documentation on this? PgFoundry doesn't appear to have any.
Thanks
Thom
2009/11/13 Valtonen, Hannu <hannu.valtonen@f-secure.com>
On 11/13/09 5:26 AM, Juan Backson wrote:
Hi,
I had a chat with Suzuki Hironobu (pgmemcached maintainer) earlier this year and we pretty much decided that pgmemcache was the way to go after which Suzuku wrote a large patch to make it also support libmemcached behaviors and earlier PostgreSQL's.
So I'd recommend just going with pgmemcache.
- Hannu
ps. As a disclaimer, I'm the current pgmemcache maintainer, I've also cc'd Suzuki san.
I'm the current maintainer of pgmemcache--Hi,
Have anyone tried pgmemcache and pgmemcached?
What is the difference betweent he two? They are both non-persistent,
so I have difficult time deciding which one to use.
Any suggestion?
Thanks,
jb
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: